Monthly Archives: April 2013

E-Voting and Parry Sound

28 Sunday Apr 2013

Posted by in Parry Sound, Town Council

≈ Comments Off on E-Voting and Parry Sound

Tags

, , ,

A few weeks ago I attended a public presentation by Intelivote Systems Inc. to Parry Sound town council concerning the e-voting system that has been proposed for the 2014 municipal elections. Council attended the presentation plus a couple of people in the audience. Cogeco recorded the presentation and I’m not sure if/when it was broadcast. This short post summarizes my thoughts following the presentation.

My use of the expression ‘e-voting’ really doesn’t properly capture the election process. The proposed voting system would also allow for telephone voting using a confidential personalized authentication code. Individuals who are registered on the town voter lists would receive their code by mail. This same code could also be used to vote online using a standard browser connection. The code can only be used once, either by phone or online. The system has safeguards in place to prevent voting abuse that seem reasonable. Like mail-in votes there is always the possibility of fraud, but it seems to be limited. I understood there will also be the option of voting in person at the usual polling station(s).

I won’t go in to the actual process or the associated pros and cons. It seems to be a reasonable system that has been widely used and validated. There are a couple of points that may be of interest to Parry Sound residents.

The e-voting process will save the town about one-third the cost of a regular paper ballot voting system. The process will make it more convenient for people who are on vacation, or unable to come to the polling stations, to vote and make their opinion count.

What did surprise me is that the candidates will be provided information on who has, and hasn’t, cast their vote as the voting process proceeds. My understanding is that online and telephone voting will start several days before Election Day. This early voting is rather common and is no surprise. You will be able to e-vote on any of the days the polls are open until the election closes and the votes are counted. But with this new e-voting system the candidates for office are able to go online at any time while the vote is ongoing to see by individual name and address who has, and hasn’t, yet cast their ballot. This means you may find yourself receiving a call to get online and vote from a candidate or their supporters, especially if they believe they have your support.

I find this a little creepy. Yes we should vote, but I’m not happy that if, and when, I vote is made quite so public, and is made instantly accessible to the candidates. When I asked about this I was told that the voting records are public documents. The only difference versus the paper ballot system is that the information will be made available on a real-time basis, at the push of a button. It will reportedly only be available to the candidates and the voting officials.

It makes me wonder if it wouldn’t be ‘interesting’ to run for council for no other reason that to have access to who has, and hasn’t, voted. It’s a bit like Santa’s naughty and nice list. I told you it felt a bit creepy.

So we will more than likely have a new voting system in place for the Parry Sound municipal elections in 2014. I’m in support of the new system after attending the presentation. It will make it easier for more people to exercise their right to vote; especially the young and the elderly for whom getting to the polling station at the stated hours can be a challenge.

We may find that it’s easier than ever to get information by going online. The price is less privacy.  Is it a fair trade-off? I don’t know, but it is a reality already.

Bad Hair Day or Just Heavy on the Gel?
(April 2013, North Shore Rugged Trail)

ParrySights-5910

The 2013 Parry Sound Budget is Approved

24 Wednesday Apr 2013

Posted by in Budget/Financial, Parry Sound, Town Council

≈ Comments Off on The 2013 Parry Sound Budget is Approved

Tags

, , , , , , , ,

Last night’s special open meeting of council resulted in an approved 2013 budget for Parry Sound. The bottom line is that the tax levy is up 1.5% over 2012, due in part to taking a little more than $90,000 from the rate stabilization reserved. This a reasonable increase given the inherent cost of living increases, aka inflation rate, for 2012, and the town’s increased costs. The actual increase for homeowners and businesses will depend on how much MPAC increases their individual property assessments. A 1.5% tax rate increase, combined with a 3% property assessment increase, means you will be paying about 4.5% more in 2013 than 2012. And for a property with a $3,000 per year tax bill in 2012, the increase is about $135, with the hypothetical 4.5% combined levy and assessment increases. Not that big, but still significant. But I’m not not sure what the actual MPAC assessment increases are, so your tax bill increase will vary, but it will be up at least 1.5%.

There were few surprises in the 2013 budget as far as I was concerned. The more interesting points were:

1. The repair of the Smelter Wharf (Salt Dock) boat launch is likely to be on the order of a quarter million dollars. That’s quite a bit of money for the town to spend to provide a free recreational service that competes with private businesses who pay local taxes, especially when we have two other boat launches available. The bad news is that the Smelter Wharf boat launch is unlikely to be open until later in the summer at the earliest, pending repairs. The good news is that repairs to the Waubuno launch are underway and it should be operational before the start of the boating season. The Champaigne Street boat launch is also available.

2. Council continues to wrangle about the purchase of new or used pickup trucks. The Director of Public Works was given the direction to look for and purchase a used truck for no more than $25,000. A new vehicle was estimated to cost on the order of $42,000. I don’t agree with the direction of council, for reasons of cost and distraction.

Doing some back of the envelope calculations I estimate the Director of Public Works time costs the town about $70/hour. If the search for a used vehicle takes 30 hours (research, review, negotiation, inspection, pick up), that adds $2,000 to the negotiated price. And if we need to add a paint job, town trucks are identified by their red colour, the cost of buying used over new is about $3-4,000. So we may be saving about $10-12,000 if we can find a suitable truck for the specified $25,000. To imagine a $17,000 price savings (40% less) the truck will be at least a couple of years old, or have excessive mileage, and a corresponding much reduced warranty period. As an aside, any truck in good condition that is reduced by this large an amount will be quickly snapped up by someone else. The town will probably end up looking at, and kicking the tires of, vehicles that have been rejected by other parties much more familiar with the vehicle and the seller.

But the real cost in my mind is the distraction. While the Director of Public Works may cost the town about $70/hour, he is capable of earning more than 5-times that amount for the town by identifying ways to save money on much bigger budget items like infrastructure repairs and upgrades. So, let’s ask the Public Works department to sharpen their specifications for new vehicles to only that which is really necessary, and then tender for new vehicles. It saves time and potentially supports local businesses, and at the same time represents a relative bargain for the town when all of the costs are added up. If we want to save money by buying used, let’s look long and hard at a replacement for the town’s fire truck which is budgeted at close to $1.5 million. A savings of 20-30% on this cost could pay for as many as ten pickup trucks, all brand new.

3. Staff was directed to prepare a proposal on upgrade options for the skateboard park. There is about $47,000 sitting in reserves for the park that council felt should be put to use for the community.

4. The new school will cost the town about $500,000 in infrastructure upgrades. In theory these upgrades could be ignored, but the cost savings of doing them now, when the roads will already be torn up at the school board’s expense, outweighs the pain of the near term costs.

There was more, but you really needed to be there to catch it all. Sometimes you can’t just sit at home and hope the news will find you. There was no Cogeco or North Star coverage of the meeting. The Moose-FM was represented by their intern. Perhaps there is a role for non-traditional media in Parry Sound, even without media privileges (yes, that was a dig, more digging below).

Digging In and Making Progress

ParrySights-0274

 

Council Meeting Notes – April 16, 2013

20 Saturday Apr 2013

Posted by in Parry Sound, Town Council

≈ Comments Off on Council Meeting Notes – April 16, 2013

Tags

, , , , , , , ,

This is a short summary of last week’s meeting. As I noted in my meeting preview notes I was away for the meeting, so I’m relying on the minutes. This post is being provided for continuity in case I want to quickly look back at council decisions.

It looks as though the April 16th meeting was remarkably short. The minutes note that it was concluded at 8:15. Nonetheless it seems council addressed all of the items before them and didn’t defer any for future discussion. Good work. Council seems to be working efficiently and effectively. Let’s hope they can carry over their focus to next week’s budget meeting.

I’m happy to see that council took a position on the sign issue, Item 9.3.3, that should benefit the town in the future. For reasons similar to why the town has building codes and property appearance by-laws, it’s reasonable to have, and enforce, a basic standard regarding signs. Less is often more, particularly when it comes to signs. I don’t know about you but when I am traveling along a US interstate and I come across a large number of ‘tacky’ signs urging me to stop, I see it as a warning to keep on going. Anyone been to ‘South of the Border’ on I-95? Anybody stopped more than once? Anyone learn a lesson?

Correspondence and Deputations

4.1 – a request to proclaim May 2013 as “Community Living Month’ was circulated to town staff and approved as below.

4.2 – a letter advising the town that it had earned $13,755 related to 4th quarter 2012 blue box recycling.

4.3 – Andrew Ryland, President of the Parry Sound Chamber of Commerce has provided a report on the chamber’s membership numbers and categories.

4.4 – the Parry Sound Chamber of Commerce has requested a discussion with the town regarding the operation of the marina. This is was not included in the council package so I don’t know what it’s about. The Chamber as you know operates Big Sound Marina so I hope there are no significant operational issues, it’s a very important town asset.

5.1 – John Jackson Planner Inc. made a presentation that proposed a total of 168 residential units to be built in the harbour area with a view over the water.  The timeline for implementation is 5 to 10 years. The development seems to depend on the town being able to provide sufficient water and sewage services. I believe this was also an issue with another harbour area development that in the end did not go forward. The presenters also asked the town to approach Imperial Oil regarding the use of their waterfront property. Bravo, in my opinion. Let’s see if we can’t get this big, lazy, risk averse corporation to take responsibility for their presumably polluted waterfront property and turn it into some sort of community asset rather than a liability.

5.2 – there was a follow up deputation regarding the use of all terrain vehicles on town streets. I don’t know what went down but this is an item not likely to be reviewed by council until September given staff’s other priorities.

5.3 – Distler Construction provided some background to Item 10.3.2 by way of a deputation.

Consent Agenda

Council approved designating May 2013 as Community Living month.

Resolutions and Directions to Staff

9.2.1 – a ‘bookkeeping’ item related to the Stockey Centre’s unfinanced capital outlay, about $32,000, was carried.

9.3.1 – council approved the report on the use of the Bobby Orr Community Centre and the creation of a committee to solicit public input into the use of the centre.

9.3.3 – another run at council regarding a realtor’s sign on the Mid-Town Hotel was denied. As per my earlier comments I think this was a good decision. In my opinion it has nothing to do with the realtor, or the real estate profession, but rather represents an investment in the town and it’s appearance. At some point you really need to create standards of appearance if you want to be taken seriously. As a town, a business or an individual. Even I realized I needed to cut my hair once I left school. (That was when my hair was brown and my teeth were white ;-)

9.4.1 – a resolution related to the new public school infrastructure was approved. There is more detail here than I properly understand. Presumably council went along with the recommendations of staff. A couple of items impacting the 2013 budget will be discussed this coming week.

By-Laws

10.3.1 – the by-law to authorize the execution of a land sale to M6 Developments, the ‘Age in Place’ project beside Canadore College, was passed.

10.3.2 – the by-law to authorize the condominium agreement with Distler Construction for the third phase of the Silver Birch development was passed.

10.3.3 – the by-law to grant site plan approval for the development of a three-unit building on Seguin Street in front of the curling rink was passed.

There was more, so I suggest you go to the town’s website to download a copy of the complete minutes.

I’ll be at the budget meeting this Tuesday, the 23rd that starts at 6:00. I expect there will be lots of empty seats, so don’t worry if you come a few minutes late. There will be room right up front, or at the back, depending on your preferred seating location.

In case you don’t remember. Yes, they are funny.

South of the Border - Exhibit A

Council Agenda Preview – April 16, 2013

16 Tuesday Apr 2013

Posted by in Parry Sound, Reflections, Town Council, Urban Development

≈ Comments Off on Council Agenda Preview – April 16, 2013

Tags

, , , , ,

From looking at the agenda and the council package this week’s meeting seems to be packed. Perhaps there aren’t many more items than normal on the agenda, but there are a number of decisions to be made, some of them not so easy. There is one item in particular than I’m interested in seeing how council votes; it’s the real estate sign on the Mid-Town Hotel building. This item is back on the agenda in hopes of a different answer. Let’s see if there is more persuasive information to change the original decision because otherwise it will become obvious to people that the way to get your way is to ‘wear down’ council. There are a number of other items that in many not so obvious ways will be shaping the way this town looks and operates in the years to come.

Correspondence and Deputations

4.1 – a request to proclaim May 2013 as “Community Living Month’.

4.2 – a letter advising the town that it had earned $13,755 related to 4th quarter 2012 blue box recycling.

4.3 – Andrew Ryland, President of the Parry Sound Chamber of Commerce has provided a report on the chamber’s membership numbers and categories.

5.1 – John Jackson Planner Inc. is making a presentation on a potential waterfront development. I’m not sure what this is about, there wasn’t much in the pre-council meeting package. I’ll try and get a copy of the presentation after the fact and provide a summary.

Consent Agenda

There is nothing on the Consent Agenda.

Resolutions and Directions to Staff

9.2.1 – this is a ‘bookkeeping’ item related to the Stockey Centre’s unfinanced capital outlay. The amount in this case is a credit of a little more than $32,000 offset against the principal.

9.3.1 – is a bit of a meandering report from staff that discusses the use of the Bobby Orr Community Centre. The report offers more background than real direction, but provides some interesting numbers regarding the BOCC, including operation and costs. The numbers of note included:
– Total ‘ice’ expense at the BOCC was about $683,000 for 2011/12, consisting of:
– ~$48,000 for administration
– ~$604,000 building costs (No detail or explanation provided. Utilities, labour, depreciation?)
– ~$32,000 for equipment (presumably the Olympia ice resurfacer)
– Revenue for ice use was $167,000 in 2011/12
– the ice surface was operated 182-days 2011/12

This amounts to a per day cost of about $3,756 per day to operate the BOCC and the ice surface for the 182-day period. The report makes the estimate that the BOCC ice surface is available for 16 hours per day, and translates into an hourly operating cost of $235. This hourly cost is a more realistic $313 per hour based on a 12-hour per day potential use. Even this seems unreasonable unless there are senior precision skating teams that likes to practice daily. I think the per hour of operation cost is mroe like $400-500 with the maximum likely use of he facility.

Revenue for use for use of the ice surface in 2011/12 was $166,565, covering about 24% of the expense. This suggests the current operating cost per hour of use is on the order than $500. Youth hockey leagues pay about $118 per hour to use the ice, and adult leagues $149 per hour, far short of the true facility costs. And these charges are at the higher end of rates for ice surface rental when looking at other communities in the near north area.

A quick analysis of the supplied figures reveals that about 40% of the kids playing in the youth hockey leagues are Parry Sound residents. The others come from the surrounding municipalities.

These are quite a few numbers to digest. It’s not easy to provide a simple analysis of what they mean and what they imply. The bottom line is that Parry Sound residents heavily subsidize the users of the ice surface at the BOCC, including users from the surrounding communities. Arguably the use of the BOCC by these non-residents is a benefit to the town as they help offset facility costs and do not preventing local residents from using the facility.

The direction asks council to approve a process by which the town can solicit community input into better use of the BOCC, presumably by reducing costs, increasing revenues or simply identifying ways the community can gain better ‘value’ from the BOCC regardless of whether there is any improvements in the cost of the facility.

Two thoughts come to mind. I can now understand why there was a brief discussion at council of shortening the ice season. At a cost of about $3,756 per day, shortening the season by even ten days could save more than $35,000. (I don’t think it’s that simple, as much of the cost is fixed and not variable.). And don’t ever, ever bring up the idea of building a community indoor swimming pool. The operating costs for that type of facility would far exceed the costs for the BOCC, and the revenue probably would be no greater than for the ice surface. and then there is the issue of liability and the associated insurance costs.

But let’s see what is presented and discussed at the council meeting.

9.3.3 – this is another run at council regarding a realtor’s sign on the Mid-Town Hotel. Denied two meetings ago, it’s back on the agenda. We’ll see what council does, but I’ll offer my two bits. You lead, follow, or get out of the way. There is little to no leadership in Parry Sound with respect to how we want the downtown to look. In theory the Downtown Business Association (DBA) should provide this leadership, but they are seemingly torn by different factions. Some DBA members probably suggest more signs are better for business regardless of appearance, while others probably feel the town from a retail perspective will never move forward until it cleans up the look of the signage and the storefronts. Council to date hasn’t taken an obvious position, often bowing to individual petition, rejecting applications only if there is an obvious safety issue.

I’ll take a position. The proposed signage is tacky and cheapens the appearance of the downtown. But it is only one of too many tacky signs in town. So can the town be fair in rejecting the request? Well if you want to lose weight you have to, at some point, look a doughnut right in the eye and say no. Yes the doughnuts feelings will be hurt, and there is some sense of inconsistency, but do you want to move forward or not? But it’s always easier just to eat the doughnut and say ‘next time it will be different’.

9.4.1 – this is a resolution related to the new public school infrastructure. The town is suggesting practical investments in local infrastructure upgrades that would support the new school’s needs and improve local services at a more reasonable cost. You need to read the council package materials for the details, but I wonder how much impact these improvements will have on the 2013 and 2014 town budgets.

By-Laws

10.3.1 – is a by-law to authorize the execution of a land sale to M6 Developments. This is the next step in the ‘Age in Place’ project beside Canadore College agreed a few meetings ago with York Developments. The contract seems to provide the appropriate level of protection for the town. It’s interesting to see that the construction timeline still envisions completion of the development by the third quarter of 2014. There is a requirement for an environmental review of the second part of the property in anticipation of additional future expansion of the development. Again I suggest you review the package for more information.

10.3.2 – this is a by-law to authorize the condominium agreement with Distler Construction for the third phase of the Silver Birch development. There seems to be little of note here except for a cryptic mention of some approval required from Parry Sound Power. We’ll perhaps find out what this about.

10.3.3 – another by-law, this one seeks to grant site plan approval for the development of a three-unit building on Seguin Street in front of the curling rink and across from Tulloch Engineering. I’ve heard that this will be a commercial plaza, perhaps home to NAPA autoparts.

There’s a little more that I didn’t cover, but nothing too critical in my opinion. I won’t be at the meeting, I’m in Philadelphia attending a conference for one of my clients. Let me know what goes on. I don’t have access to the delayed broadcast on Cogeco, so I’ll depend on the official minutes to understand the decisions made by council.

CN Wearing Out Their Welcome in the US?

11 Thursday Apr 2013

Posted by in Parry Sound, Safety, Train

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

, ,

I haven’t been posting much about the railways for the last few months. Part of it relates to other priorities, but last year I was on the Parry Sound Rail Safety Committee, and wanted to focus on local safety issues. Our recommendations have been accepted by Parry Sound town council and we’ll see what comes of it.

But I see CN has been particularly busy getting themselves into trouble over the last few months. Stuff happens, but if the railways were held to the same standards as the airlines – freight and passenger, they would not skate out of the eye of the public as easily as they seem to.

Here’s a nice overview (Railroaded – A String of CN Derailments in March) of what CN has been up to in the month of March. I wonder if they are starting to wear out their welcome south of the border.

How do you feel about the Keystone XL pipeline? It seems as though it may be the lesser of two evils, if the alternative is having CN transport the crude by rail.

Ah! The Romance of the Rails. (February 2012)
ParrySights-4440

We’re All for Rules …

08 Monday Apr 2013

Posted by in Parry Sound, Reflections, Town Council

≈ Comments Off on We’re All for Rules …

Tags

,

until they apply to us. (And I’m no different.)

This post is a follow up to a note in an earlier post where I made mention of the apparent discrepancy in what Parry Sound Council considered appropriate for pre-budget approval.

I think we can agree rules, regulations, and laws are a good thing. But they leave us conflicted. There are always one or more of these regulations and laws we think aren’t reasonable, or at least shouldn’t apply to us. It’s just not fair. But we of course fully understand and accept why they are necessary and should apply to others.

Earlier this year a councillor (A) brought up a proposal for pre-budget approval of a grant to Festival of the Sound for their opening weekend program. Councillor A, who had previously been a Festival board member, indicated it was a special occasion, the 10th anniversary of the Stockey Centre opening, and a decision was time sensitive. Early approval was required to ensure acknowledgement of the town’s support in the Festival brochure, which needed to be finalized in a few days. Another councillor (B) quickly shut down the discussion, arguing that council could not provide pre-budget approvals before the 2013 budget was finalized. (It still isn’t approved as of April 8th.)

From watching the dynamics of the discussion and the body language it seemed councillor B really didn’t like the idea of the grant. But rather than debate the issue on its merits, and possibly lose the argument, it was easier to cut it off by stating that pre-budget approvals were inappropriate. It seemed a reasonable and prudent rule for council to apply to a situation where the upcoming budget was tight and approving expenses prior to final budget review seemed inappropriate. Council agreed and the request was dismissed.

But was this a matter of principle, or a not so transparent tactic to unilaterally deny the request? A couple of related items that have come up in council sessions lead me to believe it might be the latter.

Just a month earlier councillor B  tried to derail the negotiated inclusion of town snow plowing services with the rental of the CP Station by Festival of the Sound. The councillor almost managed to get the contract revised, which would have led to a considerable delay in its execution. In the end, after two amendments, the rest of council recognized the inconsistency of the argument as presented by councillor B, and approved the contract as initially negotiated between town staff and the Festival. The reason for the objection to the snow plowing wasn’t obvious. Councillor B claimed it was an issue of consistency and principle, but never explained the logic of the argument. It seemed from my seat, in the audience, to be a little odd. The contract had been negotiated, and the cost to the town was minimal as they already had to plow as it provides overflow town parking. What was the real issue? A bad attitude with respect to the Festival?

More recently councillor B, seemingly haven forgotten their own no pre-budget approval ‘rule’, requested pre-budget approval for downtown flower baskets. Council approved the request. None of the other councillors suggested it was inappropriate, although a couple smiled. Poor memory or good team politics? I’m not sure. It’s worth noting that councillor B is the council representative for the Downtown Business Association who had a vested interest in ensuring the flower baskets are ordered in a timely manner.

Pre-budget approval of the flower baskets was probably the right thing to do, given the timelines. And turning down a grant to the Festival of the Sound may also have been the right thing to do. But it should only have been done after appropriate discussion and review of the merits of the issue, not by a councillor invoking a rule they had no intention of ever having apply to their own interests. Consistency is the basis of credibility.

You want rules? Then live by the rules.

Tri-Railing Parry Sound Style? (March 2013)

ParrySounds-3225

The Sunshine List

05 Friday Apr 2013

Posted by in Parry Sound, Reflections

≈ Comments Off on The Sunshine List

With the publication of municipal and provincial employee salaries this week there has been much interest and coverage of who makes how much. Understood, but not openly discussed, is the question of whether these individuals really ‘earn’ these salaries, all of them in excess of $100,000. Here are my quick comments.

I have no issue with public employees being fairly paid for their work. Taking a quick look at the list of our local municipal employees I see nothing inappropriate. I am surprised to see that the Director of Public Works did not make the list. That seems to be a substantial job with considerable responsibility, which is being very well managed.

Looking at the larger provincial wide list I am reminded why so many younger people want to become police, fire fighters, teachers and nurses. Beyond the considerable job security enjoyed by these professions, and the substantial retirement benefits, there is the opportunity to earn a very attractive wage. This is especially true for those individuals who take on more responsibility and move into management positions. The challenge, as many young people have found, is being accepted into these jobs. Many apply, fewer are accepted. It’s a bit like applying to, and being accepted at, the most prestigious US and Japanese universities. If you can get in, you are pretty much ensured a great job so long as you don’t mess up.

So take a look at the list and move on. If you want these jobs, get the required education, the necessary experience, and apply. There is always room for capable individuals who can assume responsibility and lead.

Heading in the Right Direction? (March 2013)ParrySights-3257

Council Meeting Notes – April 2, 2013

03 Wednesday Apr 2013

Posted by in Parry Sound, Town Council

≈ Comments Off on Council Meeting Notes – April 2, 2013

Tags

, , , , , , ,

Council did well to get finished by 9:30, despite the addition of three unscheduled deputations that took almost half an hour in total. For the most part discussion was disciplined and on topic. There were no deferred items. Council continues to come together as a group and make headway.

A short preface to these notes. It seems council needs to start thinking about what type of vision and sense of place they have for Parry Sound. Remember the old joke for which the punch line is, “We’ve already defined what you are, we’re now simply agreeing on the price.”? Well council needs to decide whether the town ethos is ‘anything goes if it brings business to town’, or if we want to raise the general standards of appearance to establish ourselves as a ‘quaint’ little near north town that attracts visitors with its charm. It’s not easy to be quaint with a lumber and rail history, and the consequences of decades of associated neglect and abuse. It will take work and purpose. We can look to the some of the towns in Muskoka for a sense of what this means and looks like. A couple of the agenda items should force council to put together their vision of the town. But I suspect they won’t. They will look at each item as a ‘one up’ issue with no consideration of the bigger picture, and what the net sum of all of their decisions will be. It’s not function or form. It’s function and form.

Closed Session Follow Up

It seems council has selected a new Director of Public Safety based on their ratification of a contract. We’ll need to wait for the formal announcement. No names were mentioned.

Correspondence and Deputations

Correspondence –  the invitation for council representatives to attend a joint meeting of the West Parry Sound Health Centre Board was received.

There were three unscheduled deputations.

The first related to council’s recent decision to return the issue of ATV use in town to staff for further review. The speaker felt that the topic had not been fairly reviewed with little opportunity for public input. Council assured the speaker that the matter had not been dismissed and would be reviewed further. They didn’t mention that staff would not be able to get to the ATV issue until late summer at the earliest, given more pressing issues.

The second deputation was in reference to council’s decision to turn the application for a realtor’s advertising sign on a downtown building. After some discussion and questions the individual was advised to request a reconsideration of their application.

The third deputation provided council with an update on the activity of the Tower Hill Gardeners, a volunteer group that has been working to complement the activities of town staff with the Tower Hill garden. It was reported that the Tower Hill Gardeners, www.towerhillheritagegarden.org, put in more than 600 volunteer hours last year. The presenter requested council support agenda item 9.5.1, the proposal for volunteers to rehabilitate the Tower Hill Ranger’s Cabin.

Consent Agenda

Council approved a new board member for the Parry Sound Downtown Business Association (DBA) Board of Directors.

Resolutions and Directions to Staff

9.1.1 – council approved staff’s recommendation to forgo the construction of an animal shelter based on cost and the service provided in Bracebridge by the Ontario Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (OSPCA) – Muskoka Branch. There were expressions of general support for this type of service but an acknowledgement that it was not possible without the financial support of the surrounding communities.

Council approved $3,500 for a spay/neuter program. It was noted that very little of this amount was likely to be spent because there was no community support to house the feral cats for the necessary period after their surgery. This was in part due to concerns about transmissible diseases, and the reality that feral cats really don’t like being kept in a ‘recovery room’. They can be feisty.

There was discussion and approval for staff to look into a method by which the feeding of feral cats could be ‘discouraged’. If you feed them they will stay, and they will breed. There’s no balance of nature when cats are fed and left to their own devices. Having grown up on a farm, and having had barn cats to keep the rodent population down, I came to realize that the cats survived only as long as they were fed by us. Nature took its own course if humans were left out of the equation. If you want a cat, have a cat, and take on the associated responsibilities of feeding, vaccinations, providing a home, and spay/neutering. How would the community feel if an individual were to start feeding sea gulls downtown? How about bears? (Oh wait, we know how people feel about bears.)

Council approved the sale/scrapping of the animal trailer after considerable discussion. The issue debated was whether it was reasonable to sell the trailer for its intended use given its unsuitability for animal care. Staff advised that if re-purposed, the trailer was likely to be stripped down and only it’s chassis reused.

9.1.2 – council split on the issue of two new ‘sitting’ areas in the downtown. The sitting area in the Gibson Street parking lot was approved with an understanding the DBA and town would discuss adjustments to the location so as to ensure appropriate sight lines for safety. (Hey, sitting at this ‘parkette’ one would have a great view of advertising right across the street ;-).)

The James Street ‘pop up parkette’ was turned down on the basis that it would take critical parking spaces and might create a safety hazard.

9.3.1 – there was approval for the proposal from staff regarding paperless council meetings through the use of electronic documents. It was agreed that the expense would be included as part of the 2013 budget discussion. Note: the next budget meeting, hopefully the last, is scheduled for April 233d, starting at 6:30 PM. There was a brief discussion of what should and shouldn’t be considered for pre-budget approval. I’ll offer my thoughts in a general sense next week.

9.4.1 – a resolution in support of signs on the CN trestle over Bowes Street was carried. I’m not in agreement but let’s see how this evolves. As a professional in the area of sales, marketing and advertising, I would suggest that advertising only works if it attracts attention. So if you want people who are driving into town to not focus on the road as they merge from two lanes to one, put up something to catch their attention. And I’m waiting for the first person with an RV/load who realizes too late that their vehicle doesn’t fit under the trestle to complain/sue that they couldn’t see the height limit sign because of the advertising. But of course, adding advertising will help beautify the town as at least one councillor seemed to suggest. I guess you could claim that we are a ‘border’ town and need to take on that appearance. Perhaps the border between Seguin and McDougall? This all goes back to the vision that council has for the town. Commerce or community? Commerce and community?

9.4.2 – the revised resolution for transferring town property on Fleck Street to a developer for the the building of an affordable triplex was approved. This was approved last year but needed revision to meet regulations concerning the transfer of property for below market prices to a private business.

9.5.1 – council approved a proposal by a citizens’ Ranger Cabin Restoration Committee to restore the Ranger Cabin on Tower Hill at no cost to the town.

9.5.2 – the DBA proposal for a raised garden at the foot of Jukes Lane was carried. Council also approved staff’s recommendation that the DBA consider other locations for additional raised gardens.

By-Laws

10.1.1 – by-laws to increase set fines for by-law traffic violations and to revise overnight parking areas were approved with limited discussion.

10.3.1 – council approved an agreement with Vianet for upgraded internet service.

10.3.2, 10.3.3 – both bylaws setting the tax ratios and tax claw-backs were approved by council.

There was a bit more that isn’t covered here. Check out the actual council minutes for a summary of all the decisions. For additional background take a look at my council meeting preview notes posted on this site.

A Comet Sets Over Parry Sound
(click for larger view – it’s worth it)

ParrySights-5206

Council Agenda Preview – April 2, 2013

01 Monday Apr 2013

Posted by in Parry Sound, Town Council

≈ Comments Off on Council Agenda Preview – April 2, 2013

Tags

, , , , ,

This week’s meeting has quite a bit more than the last few in terms of the number of items. Expect to stay until after 9:00, possibly pushing 9:30 depending on how contentious the issues prove to be. The council meeting is preceded by a presentation of the new e-voting system from 5:00 to 6:00. I assume it’s open to the public.

Correspondence and Deputations

4.1 – an invitation was received for council representatives to attend a joint meeting of the West Parry Sound Health Centre Board on April 29th, 2013 at 7:00 p.m.

There are no scheduled deputations.

Consent Agenda

The Parry Sound Downtown Business Association (DBA) Board of Directors is nominating a new board member.

Resolutions and Directions to Staff

9.1.1 – staff is recommending that Parry Sound advise the public that the town will not support an animal shelter. This is in part based on the fact that the Ontario Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (OSPCA) – Muskoka Branch, already provides animal shelter services to Parry Sound. Staff is suggesting continued support for the spay/neuter program for feral cats. (At some point I expect someone on staff or council will have the courage to suggest that rather than spay and neuter these cats the more humane action would be to have these animals put down. The remaining birds, small mammals and reptiles of the community would appreciate the action. One down, hundreds, if not thousands, saved. Even spayed and neutered feral cats hunt for food and sport.)

9.1.2 – staff is recommending against the DBA proposal to install two new ‘sitting’ areas in the downtown. One would have required the loss of parking spaces in the Gibson Street parking lot. The other would have created a ‘Pop Up Park’ on James Street towards Country Gourmet. It’s not an easy decision as evidenced by the CAO’s comments. On the one-hand the new ‘parkettes’ will reduce much needed parking spots in the downtown and the associated revenue. On the other, they do ‘soften’ the downtown and make it more inviting. The DBA focus seems to be in capturing more customers, unfortunately at the cost of the town revenue. This is not unlike the parking fee increase wrangling of 2012 where the DBA opposed meter fee increases. I’m not sure how this one will end. It will depend in part on the DBA council representative who has in the past forcefully supported various DBA initiatives and requests.

9.3.1 – town staff, in response to a direction from council, is proposing that council business go paperless with the use of electronic documents. This will mean iPads for council and key staff, as well as the necessary supporting hardware and software. The total bill is on the order of $20,000. This amount is requested for pre-budget approval. Excuse me while I shout – I THOUGHT THAT COUNCIL AGREED THEY WERE NOT GOING TO CONSIDER PRE-BUDGET APPROVAL ITEMS. This is certainly not a priority, time constrained item. Why not put it into the regular budget cue? Huh. Why not? Let’s walk the talk. (I’ll have a separate post on this in few days.)

On the subject of iPads and electronic documents, I’m in strong support. It can improve efficiency, but perhaps at the expense of effectiveness. It’s not so easy to read an e-document and make a few notes in the margins, or to highlight an important section. Yes, it can be done but it’s not easy, especially if you don’t have a fair bit of experience using the system. Expect some frustration about two months after implementation when the glow of a new toy has worn off and the councillors find it may be saving staff time, but adding to theirs. It will save me time, I won’t need to schlep to the library on Friday evenings to review the council package. One technical point – 32 GB is plenty, unless of course you plan to use it as a media viewing device, or staff can’t figure out how to make compact PDF packages.

9.4.1 – is a resolution in support of signs on the CN trestle over Bowes Street. I was at first confused, but came to realize it’s the bridge/trestle over Bowes Street just after you pass Louisa Street. Yeah, let’s junk up the town a little bit more. And let’s have moving signs so drivers will be distracted as they squeeze from two lanes to one. As a bicycle rider who has a 99.9% off-sidewalk record I really don’t want to be nailed by a tourist who at the last moment realizes he/she needs to merge left while reading that there is a new store/show/product in town. Or should I just start riding on the sidewalks and put pedestrians at risk? It’s as bad an idea as sending drivers text messages to promote a product/service/activity as they enter Parry Sound.

9.4.2 – is a revised resolution for town property on Fleck Street that was offered to a developer for the building of an affordable triplex. Instead of a $100/month rent reduction for 10 years, it is now $166/month for 7 years. The difference is about $5,800 to the benefit of the ‘town’, a bit more on a net present value basis. And if you were wondering, the builder is effectively paying $41,832 for the lot, but over seven years. I hope the $166 per unit is ‘payable’ even/if the units are not being occupied, or else the cost will be even less. The triplex is targeted to tenants from the District Social Service Administration Board waiting list. Of course, under this arrangement the town is effectively providing a subsidy to tenants. The town will not get any revenue for the sale/transfer of the lot, although it may receive future property tax revenue.

9.5.1 – council will review a proposal by a citizens’ Ranger Cabin Restoration Committee to restore the Ranger Cabin on Tower Hill at no cost to the town. Sounds like a good deal to me. (Disclosure – my wife is on the committee and is one of the volunteer gardeners on Tower Hill).

9.5.2 – the DBA continues to be active with a proposal for a raised garden at the foot of Jukes Lane. This initiative has town staff support. Town staff is separately requesting that council ask the DBA to reconsider their proposal for other raised gardens because, as currently proposed, they will interfere with parking spots and winter maintenance.

By-Laws

10.1.1 – is a by-law to increase set fines for by-law traffic violations (parking). This seems to a follow-on to the parking meter rate discussions of last year. The fines relate to things like parking in a no-parking zone, stopping in a no-stopping zone or parking in a fire route. These are zingers – the proposal is to raise fines to $55 and $75 depending on the violation. Staff is also proposing the reassignment of certain town parking areas for overnight use, to make it easier for people to leave their car overnight rather than drink and drive while visiting the downtown.

10.3.1 – the town is proposing to enter into a very attractive agreement with Vianet for internet service. How about unlimited usage at speeds of 10 Mbps up and 100 Mbps down, at two locations, for $200 in total? Sweet.

10.3.2, 10.3.3 – these are bylaws setting the tax ratios for the different classes of properties in Parry Sound. They seem to be similar or the same as last year’s.

There’s a little more that I didn’t cover, but not too critical in my opinion. I told you it would be a busy meeting.

See you there.

Perhaps there isn’t enough distraction. Let’s add some more.
(From this angle we look like a town from the movie Slapshot.)

ParrySights-3277