• Home
  • About
  • Council Minutes – Compiled
  • Parry Sound Area Reports and Resources

Parry Sounds

~ Ideas, Opinions and 'Green Shoots' In and Around Parry Sound

Parry Sounds

Monthly Archives: February 2013

Council Agenda Preview – February 19, 2013

18 Monday Feb 2013

Posted by Jo Bossart/ParrySounds.com in Parry Sound, Town Council

≈ Comments Off on Council Agenda Preview – February 19, 2013

Tags

Agenda, Bridge Art, By-Law, parry sound, Rezoning, Town Council

There is very little on the agenda this week of any real importance. There are only a limited number of agenda items. The closed portion of the meeting does have Parry Sound Hydro Corporation on the agenda. I suspect they are further discussing the generation upgrade.

Correspondence and Deputations:

4.1 – One letter was received, it was from the Ontario Ministry of Education in response to council’s letter asking for provincial involvement in the Near North School Board decision to move the Grade 7 and 8 students. The letter basically says that this is a local rather than provincial issue and that everybody needs to pay attention to good communication regarding decisions. I can agree with that.

5.1, 5.2 – Two deputations are scheduled, both from companies presenting their capabilities, presumably in hopes of capturing new business.

Agenda Highlights:

2.1.1 – is a public meeting to review the proposed rezoning for the ‘Age in Place’ facility. I’ve seen the available information. It seems non-controversial.

9.2.1 – is a direction to advise the public that the fees for cemetery services will be increased. This gets the fees closer to the actual costs, with higher fees for non-residents.

9.4.1 – comments and revisions to the town’s official plan are back on the agenda as a direction to staff.

9.6.1 – is a resolution arising from the Mayors-Chiefs-Reeves meeting held on February 6th regarding the low water levels in the Great Lakes. It basically requests action be taken to study and address the problem. It’s a start. The council package contains a report of the actual meeting that is worth reviewing. I have requested an electronic copy of the document that I can share with the public.

10.2.1 – is a by-law to enter into an agreement with a provider to supply family assistance services for town employees.

10.2.2 – another by-law, this one to increase fees for certain services provided by the town. This is all part of closing the budget gap. I guess this is reasonable as it increases costs for those who use the services and spares those that don’t. None of the increases seems egregious.

That’s it. I skipped none of the agenda items. And as long as none of the councillors takes more than the time allotted for their report we will be out of there no later than 8:30, even with the rezoning session. See you there.

If you didn’t get out on the trails this past weekend you missed the very best weekend of the winter so far. We are lucky to have the trails we do, so go out and enjoy them. I did, which explains in part why this post is a little later than usual. I’ve posted below one of the many photos I took over the weekend. It’s a late afternoon shot from the North Shore Rugged Trail.

I have turned the many Bridge Art photos into a couple of short videos. Take a look if you want to be reminded of what can be found behind the Rotary Algonquin Regiment Fitness Trail bridges. Here’s a link to where they are hosted at ParrySights. This site posts up a daily photo that features life in and around Parry Sound. One of the town councillors was featured February 1st, so take a peek.

The Sound – As Cold as Ice

ParrySights-4451

Age in Place – Some Good Answers

13 Wednesday Feb 2013

Posted by Jo Bossart/ParrySounds.com in Parry Sound

≈ Comments Off on Age in Place – Some Good Answers

Tags

economic development, Growth, parry sound, Planning, Rezoning, Town Council

Parry Sound staff and council has been good enough to provide additional information concerning the recently approved ‘Age in Place’ development, also referred to in some documents as a retirement residence. After taking some time to review these redacted documents, which were part of the closed session council package, I’m pleased with the work done by staff in support of their recommendation to approve the York Health Care Developments proposal. (A redacted document in one that makes certain, usually limited, confidential information illegible to the reader. This is a pretty common practice and really is not an issue here. In this case the redacted portions of the documents largely relate to a second proposal that was not accepted by the town, and for which the party making the proposal requested confidentiality.)

The information contained in the documents is consistent with the general outline of the project as has previously been made available to the public in a press release and traditional media interviews. There are some additional points contained in the documents that are worth noting.

There may be additional construction beyond the planned 60 to 80 residences. Apparently the rezoning application only applies to about half the property, which will be used for the proposed four-floor residence. There is the potential to rezone and build additional living spaces on the remaining property.

The town has thought through the issues that were an issue with the last major development at the south end of town. In particular staff has identified additional costs and services that will, or may, be required and has made a statement concerning who will be responsible for those costs. This should mean fewer surprises.

There is information on how the selling price of $250,000 was recommended to council. I’m glad to understand the logic behind the recommendation. It makes sense. It’s also nice to see that staff has identified the requirement for a property ‘reacquisition’ clause in the final contract in case the development does not proceed as proposed.

One final thought after reading the released information. In addition to providing as many as 40 area jobs, full-time and part-time to operate the facility, and the construction jobs (there is a statement that local contractors are preferred), the residence could provide an estimated $100,000 per year in tax revenue. Not mentioned but another consideration is that this complex will help offset water and waste water infrastructure costs as part of their monthly ‘water bill’. The existing system should be able to easily accommodate the added load without any significant investment in capital or operating expenses.

Like council, with this additional information, I’m bullish on the proposal. It looks as though staff has done a great job of identifying the key issues and addressing them upfront. I’m glad they shared their thinking about the proposal. There will be more issues I’m sure, but that’s always the case. You just don’t want to be dealing in the future with issues that should have been addressed right from the start.

The redacted documents are available to the public. You should read them to understand all of the issues involved and the many facts and figures of the project. I’m sure you can ask for them from the town directly, or you can save yourself and the town a little extra work by downloading them through the links below.

Redacted Staff Report and Recommendation
Redacted Summary of Proposals
Property Rezoning Announcement
York Health Care Developments Proposal
York Health Care Development Proposal Appendices

Let’s keep doors closed and communications open.Parry Sound Town Hall

Council Meeting Summary – February 5, 2013

08 Friday Feb 2013

Posted by Jo Bossart/ParrySounds.com in Parry Sound, Town Council

≈ Comments Off on Council Meeting Summary – February 5, 2013

Tags

Bridge Art, budget, By-Law, Finance Committee, North Star, parry sound, Planning, social media, Town Council

Well my request for media privileges was denied. I have already posted on this, no need to discuss it further. Here’s a link to my earlier post, or just scroll down this page past this article to find it. Oh, just as I was getting a link for the item below I see that the North Star has put together their overview of the matter. Here’s the link although I expect it’s in the Beacon Star today (their free Friday publication).

The North Star has done a very nice article on the senior staff reorganization in town hall I mentioned in my council meeting preview. I won’t discuss it further and just point you to their online article. (I recommend a subscription to the North Star, there’s something nice about reading things in print. And it ensures we continue to get local news coverage like this.)

Meeting Highlights

Councillors and Mayor Reports:

Seguin Township will provide $10,000 in support of the Stockey Centre for 2013. That’s great, but it doesn’t go very far in covering the centre’s 2013 budgeted shortfall of $275,000.

There was a mention that many Ontario municipalities are facing major investments in aging infrastructure, with little hope for provincial support. Belleville is preparing to take on $80 million dollars of bonds and loans to meet its infrastructure expanses. That’s for a town with a population about eight times that of Parry Sound. Previous councils in Parry Sound were able to take advantage of matching provincial grants to replace and update our infrastructure, so we are a bit better off than other municipalities, albeit with some debt on the books.

Correspondence and Deputations:

Of the three letters received one, concerning an animal shelter, was put on the meeting agenda as item 9.1.1 and received extensive discussion.

There were four deputations, two of them primarily of an update nature from Georgian Bay Country Tourism, and the West Parry Sound Health Centre and Lakeland Long Term Care. The other two were my request for media privileges (agenda item 9.2.2), and another requesting a by-law to permit the limited use of all-terrain vehicles in town.

9.1.1 – a resolution to advise the community that Parry Sound cannot support an animal shelter was postponed pending further research and inquiry with neighbouring communities regarding their interest and support for such an initiative. Apparently there is an offer of $50,000 in private support for a local animal shelter. A second resolution regarding a $3,5000 budget item for the spaying and neutering of feral cats was also postponed.

9.1.2, 9.1.3 – resolutions related to fines and new parking meters were approved although there were two dissenting votes. The objections were largely related to the fact that the approval for a new parking machine should not be accepted in the absence of an approved budget.

Question to staff and council – why isn’t the 2013 budget ready for January 1st? Isn’t that when the budget year starts? I am aware of some collective bargaining issues and funding issues impacting the budget that will only be available later, but 80% of the budget could be reviewed, agreed, and ‘in the can’ by year end. Much of this silly ‘we can’t agree to this now’ language could then be eliminated. It sounds very bureaucratic. “I’m sorry M’am the hospital staff couldn’t attend to your son’s injuries because his accident isn’t in the current budget and we haven’t finalized the new one.” Come on council, roll with it, or get that 80% of the budget done by Christmas so you have the ability to make decisions. Council, you will still need to make the tough decisions, which it seems are more determined by personal philosophy than the budget. But the ‘crush’ of a final budget discussion can provide cover for unpopular decisions. “There was so much to review I guess it just was missed. Sorry about that.”

9.2.1 – the 2012 Annual Report of the Integrity Commissioner was approved without discussion. Yes, I will request a copy and let you know if anything of interest is included.

9.2.2 –a direction to deny my request for media privileges was carried. My blog was scurrilously impugned as an ‘information and opinion website’. I’d like to think of it as an ‘information and analysis website’. But you can only provide ‘analysis’ if you are provided the requested public domain information. I’ll keep asking for it. I’m sure the response of council would be the same, regardless of any label of opinion or analysis. At the same time council approved a resolution to extend media privileges solely to journalists employed by media outlets. I don’t believe they defined a media outlet.

9.2.3 – a direction to advise the public of amendments to the Fees and Services By-laws was approved.

9.2.4 –a resolution to approve the 2013 Key Performance Objectives Departmental Summary was carried. I’ll review it and provide details.

9.4.1 – a resolution to accept two offers for the purchase of property in town was carried.

9.4.2 – a direction to offer an additional two lots for sales by tender on MacFarlane Street was approved.

9.4.3 – revisions to the draft Official Plan were postponed until the next meeting of council.

9.6.1 – a resolution for council to endorse pre-budget approval of $5,000 to sponsor the Festival of the Sound’s opening weekend this summer was defeated even though this was a time sensitive issue. Because there isn’t an approved budget a decision to discuss the merits of the request could not even be entered into. I’m starting to think the role of this blog is less analysis than performing the role of the Greek chorus. For the lack of a budget a council was paralyzed. This whole budget process seems more a topic for a play by Aristophanes than Sophocles or Euripides, that is comedy rather than tragedy.

10.4.1 – an agreement with MasterCard to sponsor the Bobby Orr Hall of Fame and the associated golf tournament was approved. For 2013 MasterCard will pay $35,000 for this privilege.

10.4.2 – a by-law to update fees and charges for planning services was carried.

A couple of late agenda items were added. These included the granting of a 6-month temporary taxi license, and the addition of another individual to the Citizen’s Finance Committee. A closed meeting reorganization included a change in the status of a Stockey Centre employee from permanent full-time to permanent part-time. This will save $25,000 per year and help close the Stockey Centre’s 2013 funding gap.

The next meeting of council is February 19th. See you there.

Note: this is the last of the ‘official’ images painted on the fitness trail bridge and brings an end to the photos that have been included in posts related to official town business. To the students, parents and teachers of Parry Sound, especially Victory School, I offer congratulations and thanks for sharing your art and your vision.

Bridge Art – So long and thanks for the images.

BridgeArt - Learn

Council Deputation Update

06 Wednesday Feb 2013

Posted by Jo Bossart/ParrySounds.com in Parry Sound, Suggestions, Town Council

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

By-Law, parry sound, Planning, social media, Town Council, Transparency

I had the opportunity to speak to Parry Sound Town Council last night regarding my request for media privileges. It was agenda item 9.2.2. The text of my deputation is provided below in italicized text.

My request for media privileges was denied following some debate. More debate than I have heard for other, more important, and more controversial issues. But in the end they largely felt that this would be opening the door for others to request similar privileges. These privileges would be limited to the right to make recordings of council proceedings without prior request of the mayor, and the right to attend media only council events. Not much I must confess, but an important statement concerning council’s desire to maintain a policy of open and transparent government.

Well, you can’t get want what you want if you don’t ask. I have no problem with the decision but I have a couple requests of council that I will send them in a formal letter. They are:

1. Will the town provide residents of Parry Sound with no cost access to the proceedings of council if these residents are unable to attend council meetings because of poor health, work and/or family obligations, travel issues or other reasons? Right now the only way a person can review the meetings is if they subscribe to Cogeco cable which implies a $300 to $400 annual cost. This seems an excessive burden to ensure transparency. There are options, see my comment about Sudbury in the text of the deputation below. (Full disclosure: I don’t subscribe to cable, satellite or other television service, so this would save me some money in case I were to miss a meeting of council, or not permitted to attend a council meeting that was restricted to traditional media.)

2. Will the town make a commitment to improving the user friendliness of the town’s website? As it stands now it is difficult to find recent announcements on the website. Too often important announcements are buried and hard to find while months old announcements are still posted on the site’s homepage. Tip – there are two ways to find things on the town’s website. Do a Google search using the following phrase – townofparrysound.com “searched term”. The “searched term” shouldn’t be in quotes. So for example if I want to find information on the recently approved retirement residence I would put into the Google search engine: “townofparrysound.com retirement” (no quotes). The search results will start with the results from the town’s website. Another approach is to click on ‘Site Map’ in the menu on the top left of the homepage. The menu bar at the top of the page is mostly useless. The link for Site Map will take you to a page that provides much more detail on the site’s contents. (Update: I was asked why not use the search box on the left hand side of the home page. Because it doesn’t work as well, not nearly as well! Try it. Do a search for retirement as I suggested above and then search the same word using the search box below the Home Menu. You tell me which does a better job.)

Here’s the text of my deposition. In it I also take council to task for the apparent hypocrisy of criticizing the Near North School Board for their lack of transparency and public involvement while doing exactly the same thing with their recent ‘Age in Place’ by-law. My deputation provides the details.

Deputation to Parry Sound town Council, February 5th, 2013. All text that was read at the meeting is presented in italics below. The section in bold is the resolution from the minutes of the Town of Parry Sound council meeting that I made reference to.

Thank you for this opportunity to speak to council.

This deputation concerns two issues. The first of which is my request for media privileges related to town council activities.

I made application a couple of weeks ago for media privileges so that I would be able to better cover council proceedings. I limited this request to, access to meetings that were limited to media, and the privilege to record portions of the town council, as is permitted traditional media outlets.

On Friday I received a copy of the council report and recommendation prepared by town staff on this issue. It recommended my request be denied.

In part the recommendation rested on the staff observation that Toronto does not extend such privileges to non-traditional media. While the report did note that the comparison was not perfect they still felt it was appropriate. I beg to differ.

Not only does Toronto have a population some 500 times greater than that of Parry Sound, it is home to dozens of traditional and possibly hundreds of nontraditional media. I can understand their policy. They already have considerable coverage of their events at the local, provincial, national and international levels. But, Toronto does have a significant program of outreach to the public that we do not have in Parry Sound. For example, Toronto offers email updates on council and committee activities that can be subscribed to. This provides email delivery of meeting agendas, announcements of changes, meeting minutes, a summary of key decisions and much more. The Toronto city clerk also provides the public with council updates using Twitter. These are programs which I have asked staff and council to consider as part of making it easier for residents to understand what is happening at council.

I would ask that my request for media privileges be held to the same standard that council and staff holds themselves with respect to media outreach. If you are willing to provide the services offered by Toronto I am willing to accept their non-traditional media policy.

I was particularly surprised that staff would have benchmarked Parry Sound against a Southern Ontario city. We are a proud Northern Ontario city. I suggest we be careful about identifying ourselves as anything but.

Turning to Northern Ontario, I do note that Sudbury offers next day webcasts of their council meetings. This means that residents can see the very next day what is going on without having to subscribe to a service that costs on the order of $400 per year. Those without internet service in Sudbury would be able to go to their local library and watch the webcast at no cost, and on their schedule. And Sudbury has 5 years of council meetings available for viewing on demand. In Parry Sound I am unable to see the proceedings of an earlier council meeting without a cable TV subscription. Offering a Sudbury type service in Parry Sound would mean that I could ‘attend’ all council meetings, even those that are restricted to ‘traditional media’ so long as they are recorded and streamed over the internet.

The second topic of this deputation relates to council’s decision to review and de facto approve the ‘Age in Place’ proposal in a closed session of council.

This is a multi-million dollar project for which town residents have received very little information and no opportunity to provide input. I have seen council discuss and debate in great detail pennies on the ton differences in costs for road salt, and plowing responsibilities for rental properties. Yet on this multi-million dollar project we get a reading of the by-law and essentially a unanimous vote of approval. Has council lost its voice?

Why wasn’t this item reviewed in closed session, if necessary to ensure confidentiality, and then put on the agenda for the following session of council with the appropriate supporting materials included in the council package for public review? This would have given the public the opportunity to review and provide input.

Is it a good deal for Parry Sound? Quite possibly. But we really can’t be sure because we are not provided the necessary information to understand what’s involved. What do we really know about the project and the developer and the local impact if all we are provided is a press release. And even this press release is only made available as a Word document, not the much more accessible Adobe Acrobat format, and it’s not posted on the front page on the town’s website where it could be easily found by interested residents.

It’s likely that council feels they were following the normal council procedures, and that any complaints about how the process and approval were handled are unwarranted.

What then does council have to say about the recent controversy concerning the decision made by the Near North School Board to move Grade 7 & 8 students to the high school? I’m sure the school board followed the approved process for reviewing and making a decision. But it was this council that passed a resolution on the matter. I will read you your resolution:

RESOLUTION 2012 – 214

WHEREAS the Near North District School Board passed a motion at its recent Board meeting to move Grades 7 & 8’s from local public schools to Parry Sound High School; and

WHEREAS the Board at this meeting added this item to the agenda as a last minute agenda item without any public notification; and WHEREAS the local Board trustee who represents the parents in the affected area was also unaware until the Chair requested the addition of the items to the agenda; and

WHEREAS the Board has not provided any justification or documentation showing the benefits to their decision or any plan showing how it is to be implemented; and

WHEREAS the whole process has been done without involving or seeking input from affected parents and students;

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Council for the Town of Parry Sound supports the Township of Carling’s request that the Minister of Education, the Honourable Laurel Broten, intervene in this case and send Ministry staff in to review and report to the local communities on how the Near North District School Board conducts its meetings and it financial business; and

FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that the Chair of the Near North School Board, Kathy Hewitt be forced to resign her position as Chair over the way this issue has been handled under her leadership; and

FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be provided to Jim Beatty, School Board Trustee, Norm Miller, M.P.P., Parry Sound-Muskoka, Vic Fedeli, M. P. P., Nipissing and to the West Parry Sound Municipalities, to request their support.

CARRIED

I would suggest that the school board’s decision was no less transparent than council’s regarding the ‘Age in Place’ approval. Where was the public information, where was the discussion, where was the opportunity to provide public input? Where was this scheduled? This is not a simple pennies on a ton type decision for which we were provided much more information and an opportunity to input.

And this council asked for a person to be removed from their elected office. Is council willing to hold themselves to the same standards of conduct?

Of particular concern is the decision to sell the property for this development for $250,000, and then waive the by-law requiring a market assessment of its real value. No concessions were offered to the developer? We’ll never know will we?

All of this leads me to ask what council plans to do regarding an upcoming decision to invest $10 to $20 million in new generating capacity at the Cascade Street Generating Station. Will this be another closed session discussion and decision then added at the last minute to the open council agenda for a unanimous vote with no review and debate? I certainly hope not. And I’m not sure the traditional media has yet recognized that this issue is in the offing.

I believe there is a role in Parry Sound for non-traditional media. I hope you will reject the staff recommendation and approve my request. And in the near future I hope you will ask staff to review and update their policy and procedures for communicating council activities with town residents. The current procedures are in dire need of updating.

And let’s all of us hold ourselves to the same standards that we hold others.

Council Agenda Preview – February 5, 2013

04 Monday Feb 2013

Posted by Jo Bossart/ParrySounds.com in Parry Sound, Town Council

≈ Comments Off on Council Agenda Preview – February 5, 2013

Tags

Agenda, By-Law, parry sound, Planning, social media, Town Council

The big issue on the agenda this week, as far as I am concerned, is my request for media privileges. This really won’t change things much but does allow me to attend meetings that are closed to the public, and open to the media. I’ve attached the Council Report and Recommendation that was provided to me last Friday. Staff has recommended that I not be granted these privileges, partly on the basis that Toronto does not grant similar privileges and because they feel that our council and staff processes are transparent. I hope that they are prepared to be held to the same standards of communication as the City of Toronto staff and council. We’ll see what transpires, I’ll be there to watch. On a positive note, I’m pleased to see that town staff has separated the list of upcoming events on the town’s website to make it easier to see what Council and Committee meetings are scheduled.

The closed portion of Tuesday’s council meeting includes an organizational chart revision. In a previous closed session responsibility for the planning function was moved to the Director of Development & Leisure Services, Lynn Middaugh, previously Director of Economic Development and Leisure Services. (Here’s a link to the recent chart on the town’s website.) This organization chart lists the previous Director of Community Development, Iain Laing, as “Planner”. I have no idea what additional organizational changes are being made, but I hope there are ongoing announcements of changes at the director level. I only found out about this change from a blog reader who noticed the change in titles in the last council meeting agenda. Note: As a bit of a non sequitur, Mr. Laing is listed as Director of Community Development in the February 5th council meeting agenda.

Agenda Highlights:

Correspondence and Deputations:

Three letters were received. One, concerning an animal shelter, was put on the meeting agenda as item 9.1.1.

There are two deputations scheduled, both seem to be council information updates. They are from: Georgian Bay Country Tourism, and the West Parry Sound Health Centre and Lakeland Long Term Care.

9.1.1 – is a resolution to advise the community that Parry Sound cannot support an animal shelter. This type of service would be additional to the existing animal impound centre. There is also a recommendation that the town budgets $3,5000 for the spaying and neutering of feral cats. I wonder if this should be reconsidered in light of the recent reports that domesticated cats kill tens of billions of birds, reptiles and small mammals in the USA. Translating these figures to Canada suggests our cats are killing hundreds of millions for Canada. And feral cats that don’t get fed regularly presumably hunt for food and sport.

9.1.2, 9.1.3 – are resolutions related to fines and new parking meters.

9.2.1 – is the 2012 Annual Report of the Integrity Commissioner. This is worth a read. I’ll get a copy and provide a summary.

9.2.2 – is a direction to deny my request for media privileges. There is also a resolution to extend media privileges solely to established media outlets.

9.2.3 – is a direction to advise the public of amendments to the Fees and Services By-laws. Most notably, it will now cost $140 for a marriage license, a 23% increase. Cheaper to ‘live in sin’?

9.2.4 – is a resolution to approve the 2013 Key Performance Objectives Departmental Summary. I’ll try to get to the library tomorrow and read it in more detail with notes posted as appropriate.

9.4.1 – is a resolution to accept two offers for property that were recently put up for tender. Both of the offers recommended for acceptance are higher than the appraised value for the properties.

9.4.2 – is a direction to offer an additional two lots for sales by tender. These lots are situated on MacFarlane Street.

9.6.1 – is a resolution for council to endorse pre-budget approval of $5,000 to sponsor the Festival of the Sound’s opening weekend this summer.

10.4.2 – is a by-law to update the by-laws regulating the fees and service charges for planning services. This follows up council discussions over the past few meetings.

There’s more, but these are the key topics as far as I can tell. See you Tuesday night. If you want to know what went down last year at council I have compiled all of the council minutes into a single PDF document that can be easily searched.

There is a meeting on the 6th between Parry Sound, the Archipelago and some other municipalities to discuss the low water levels. You are not invited; this is an ‘only by invitation’ affair. But ‘traditional press’ may of course attend. If you have a Cogeco cable television subscription it should be broadcast at some point in the future. If you don’t, you are out of luck. I have asked town staff about what arrangements they are making for people like me who don’t have Cogeco television service. Making this meeting accessible to all residents would be consistent with their declared policy of fostering transparency.

Bridge Art – Adventure

BridgeArt - Explore

ParrySounds.com Feed

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

Categories

  • Amalgamation
  • Boating/Recreation
  • Budget/Financial
  • Correction/Clarification
  • Economics
  • Events/Activities
  • Green Shoots
  • Parry Sound
  • Reflections
  • Safety
  • Seguin Township
  • Sights
  • Sounds
  • Suggestions
  • Town Council
  • Train
  • Urban Development
  • Video
  • Weather

Archives

  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011

Attractions/Events

  • Town of Parry Sound
  • The Stockey Centre

Government

  • Town of Parry Sound

News

  • North Star / Beacon Star
  • Parry Sound Weather
  • Moose FM CKLP 103.3 – Parry Sound

Tourism

  • Explorers Edge

Follow me on Twitter

My Tweets

Blog at WordPress.com.

Cancel

 
Loading Comments...
Comment
    ×